Opioides e o sistema imunológico: relevância clínica / Opioids and the immune system: clinical relevance / Los opioides y el sistema inmunológico: relevancia clínica

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: O crescente uso de opioides para o tratamento da dor é uma realidade em vários países. Com o aumento do uso aparecem questionamentos menos usuais, como a influência dos opioides nas respostas imunológicas. O presente estudo tem como objetivo detalhar a resposta imunológica explorando as influências dos efeitos dos opioides sobre a resposta inflamatória em situações experimentais e clínicas, bem como sua importância para a prática diária. CONTEÚDO: Após revisão de artigos publicados em revistas indexadas no Medline, foi descrita a resposta imunológica de forma geral, especialmente em seu aspecto celular. Após essa abordagem, foram identificados os mecanismos de liberação dos opioides endógenos e a modulação da resposta imune aos opioides exógenos na dor aguda e crônica, sempre finalizando com as implicações clínicas e sua aplicabilidade na rotina de atendimento. CONCLUSÕES: Embora vários estudos apontem para um efeito imunodepressor dos opioides, a relevância clínica dessas observações continua incerta e serve apenas como um prerrequisito para que novas investigações nessa área sejam conduzidas. Recomendações definitivas para a aplicação de opioides, nas mais variadas situações da prática clínica em relação às consequências imunológicas desses fármacos, ainda não podem ser dadas até o momento presente.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The increasing use of opioids for pain treatment is a reality in several countries and, therefore, unusual questions arise, such as the influence of opioids on immune responses. The present study aims to detail the immune response by exploring the influences of opiate effects on inflammatory response in experimental and clinical situations, as well as its importance in daily practice. CONTENT: After reviewing the articles published in journals indexed in Medline, we found that immune response has been generally described, especially regarding its cellular aspect. Following this approach, we identified the mechanisms of endogenous opioid release, modulation of immune response to exogenous opioids in acute and chronic pain, always ending with the clinical implications and applicability in routine care. CONCLUSIONS: Although several studies point to an immunosuppressive effect of opioids, the clinical relevance of these observations remains uncertain and only serves as a prerequisite for further investigations in this area. Definitive recommendations for the use of opioids in various situations of clinical practice regarding the immunological consequences of these drugs still cannot be provided until the present moment.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El creciente uso de opioides para el tratamiento del dolor es una realidad en varios países. Con el incremento de su uso van surgiendo cuestionamientos menos comunes, como la influencia de los opioides en las respuestas inmunológicas. El presente estudio tiene el objetivo de detallar la respuesta inmunológica explorando las influencias de los efectos de los opioides sobre la respuesta inflamatoria en situaciones experimentales y clínicas, como también su importancia para la práctica diaria. CONTENIDO: Después de la revisión de los artículos publicados en revistas indexadas en el Medline, se describió la respuesta inmunológica de forma general, especialmente en su aspecto celular. Después de ese abordaje, se identificaron los mecanismos de liberación de los opioides endógenos y la modulación de la respuesta inmune a los opioides exógenos en el dolor agudo y crónico, siempre finalizando con las implicaciones clínicas y con su aplicabilidad en la rutina de atención. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque varios estudios nos indiquen un efecto inmunodepresor de los opioides, la relevancia clínica de esas observaciones continúa sin conocerse por completo y solo sirve como un prerrequisito para que nuevas investigaciones en esa área puedan llegar a buen puerto. Las recomendaciones definitivas para la aplicación de los opioides en las más variadas situaciones de la práctica clínica con relación a las consecuencias inmunológicas de esos fármacos, todavía no han salido a la luz.

New perspective on the pathophysiology of panic: merging serotonin and opioids in the periaqueductal gray

Panic disorder patients are vulnerable to recurrent panic attacks. Two neurochemical hypotheses have been proposed to explain this susceptibility. The first assumes that panic patients have deficient serotonergic inhibition of neurons localized in the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter of the midbrain that organize defensive reactions to cope with proximal threats and of sympathomotor control areas of the rostral ventrolateral medulla that generate most of the neurovegetative symptoms of the panic attack. The second suggests that endogenous opioids buffer normal subjects from the behavioral and physiological manifestations of the panic attack, and their deficit brings about heightened suffocation sensitivity and separation anxiety in panic patients, making them more vulnerable to panic attacks. Experimental results obtained in rats performing one-way escape in the elevated T-maze, an animal model of panic, indicate that the inhibitory action of serotonin on defense is connected with activation of endogenous opioids in the periaqueductal gray. This allows reconciliation of the serotonergic and opioidergic hypotheses of panic pathophysiology, the periaqueductal gray being the fulcrum of serotonin-opioid interaction.

Opioid peptides, opioid receptors and mechanism of down regulation.

Biogenesis of various endogenous opioid peptides, anatomical distribution and the characteristics of multiple receptors with which they interact provides an opportunity for understanding the role of opioid systems and mechanism of opioid tolerance. Cellular and anatomical distribution of opioid receptor and their function is important for identification of neuronal systems and local network involved in initiation of drug action and subsequent development of adaptations resulting from repeated drug use. The details concerning discovery and progress in endogenous opioid peptide research and their distribution in brain have been described in this review. This review also describes opioid receptors, their distribution and mechanism of down regulation, which may be one of the causes for tolerance to opioids. Agonist induced down regulation and recent evidence for involvement of ubiquitin/proteasome system in this process has been discussed.

Influence of GnRH Agonist and Neural Antagonists on Stress-blockade of LH and Prolactin Surges Induced by 17 beta-estradiol in Ovariectomized Rats

In our previous study, we demonstrated that immobilization stress blocked estrogen-induced luteinizing hormone(LH) surge possibly by inhibiting the synthesis and release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) at the hypothalamic level and by blocking estrogen-induced prolactin (PRL) surge by increasing the synthesis of dopamine receptor at the pituitary level in ovariectomized rats. The present study was performed to determine whether immobilization stress affects pituitary LH responsiveness to GnRH, and whether endogenous opioid peptide (EOP) and dopamine systems are involved in blocking LH and PRL surges during immobilization stress. Immobilization stress was found to inhibit basal LH release and to completely abolish LH surge. However, the intravenous application of GnRH agonist completely restored immobilization-blocked LH surge and basal LH release. Treatment with naloxone did not exert any effect on immobilization-blocked LH surge but increased basal LH release during immobilization stress. Pimozide did not affect immobilization-blocked LH surge or basal LH release. Naloxone also decreased immobilization-induced basal PRL release, but had no effect on immobilization-blocked PRL surge. Immobilization-increased basal PRL levels were augmented by pimozide treatment and immobilization-blocked PRL surge was dramatically restored by pimozide. We conclude that immobilization stress does not impair pituitary LH response to GnRH, and that the immobilization stress-induced blockage of LH surge is probably not mediated by either the opioidergic or the dopaminergic system. However, immobilization-blockade of PRL surge may be partly mediated by the dopaminergic system.

Antinociceptive pattern of flavone and its mechanism as tested by formalin assay.

Flavone, dextrose and long swim stress exhibited antinociception. Degree of antinociception was greater with long swim stress as compared to flavone or dextrose. Combination of these treatments resulted in potentiation of antinociception. Naloxone (opioid antagonist; 5 mg/kg i.p.) antagonised flavone or long stress induced antinociception showing opioid medicated mechanism, however, failed to reverse the potentiated antinociceptive component recorded in long stressed animals which received flavone and dextrose. Antinociceptive activity of flavone, dextrose and long swim stress which was documented by acetic acid assay has been confirmed in the present study. Role for opioid system in this action has been demonstrated. Therefore, formalin test can also be considered as an useful assay procedure for testing flavonoids. However, like acetic acid assay this assay procedure also has the limitation that it is unable to detect minor changes in the degree of antinociception produced by physiological interventions such as long swim and dextrose.